naming and necessity pdf

Naming and necessity pdf

File Name: naming and necessity .zip
Size: 22954Kb
Published: 01.06.2021

Rigid Designators

Naming and Necessity

Naming, Necessity and More

In , the University of Haifa awarded Saul Kripke an honorary degree and hosted a conference in his honour. The papers collected in this volume descend from that conference.

Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. DOI: Kripke Published Philosophy.

Rigid Designators

A rigid designator designates the same object in all possible worlds in which that object exists and never designates anything else. This technical concept in the philosophy of language has critical consequences felt throughout philosophy. In their fullest generality, the consequences are metaphysical and epistemological. Whether a statement's designators are rigid or non-rigid may determine whether it is necessarily true, necessarily false, or contingent. This metaphysical status is sometimes out of accord with what one would expect given a statement's apparent epistemological status as a posteriori or a priori. Statements affected include central ones under investigation in philosophical subdisciplines from the philosophy of science to mind to ethics and aesthetics. Hence, much of the discussion in various subdisciplines of philosophy is explicitly or implicitly framed around the distinction between rigid and non-rigid designators.

Escritos - Fac. ISSN Between January and February of , the American philosopher Saul Kripke delivered three significant lectures at Princeton University which were published as Naming and Necessity. In those lectures, in addition to criticising the descriptive theories, topics of major importance such as names, reference, rigidity, modality and necessity were raised. Based on his three lectures and the paper Identity and Necessity , which was published a year after the publication of Naming and Necessity , the following four ideas will be developed: firstly, necessity and identity in the direct reference theories; secondly, rigid designators and possible worlds; thirdly, initial baptism; and finally, naming and necessity.

Naming and Necessity

Sign in Create an account. Syntax Advanced Search. Naming and Necessity. Saul Kripke. Harvard University Press If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.

The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later. Citations per year. Duplicate citations. The following articles are merged in Scholar.

It seems that you're in Germany. We have a dedicated site for Germany. Saul Kripke's Naming and Necessity was one of the most influential philosophical works of the twentieth century. In this collection of essays leading specialists explore issues arising from this and other works of Kripke's. JavaScript is currently disabled, this site works much better if you enable JavaScript in your browser.

Naming, Necessity and More

Semantics of Natural Language pp Cite as. I hope that some people see some connection between the two topics in the title. If not, anyway, such connections will be developed in the course of these talks. Materialism, in this form, often now gets involved in very intricate ways in questions about what is necessary or contingent in identity of properties — questions like that.

Naming and Necessity is a book with the transcript of three lectures, given by the philosopher Saul Kripke , at Princeton University in , in which he dealt with the debates of proper names in the philosophy of language. Language is a primary concern of analytic philosophers , particularly the use of language to express concepts and to refer to individuals. In Naming and Necessity , Kripke considers several questions that are important within analytic philosophy:.

Naming and Necessity

 Сэр, - удивленно произнесла Сьюзан, - просто это очень… - Да, да, - поддержал ее Джабба.  - Это очень странно.

Download options

Мы говорим о математике, а не об истории. Соши замолчала. - Полезный груз? - предложил Бринкерхофф.  - Количество жертв. Ущерб в долларах. - Нам нужна точная цифра, - напомнила Сьюзан.  - Оценки ущерба всюду приводятся разные.

0 comments

Leave a reply